Shame
May 13, 1999
But there went up a mist from the earth, and watered the whole face of the ground. And the Lord God formed man of the dust of the ground, and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life; and man became a living soul.
And the Lord God caused a deep sleep to fall upon Adam, and he slept: and he took one of his ribs, and closed up the flesh instead thereof; And the rib, which the Lord God had taken from man, made he a woman, and brought her unto the man.
And the Lord God called unto Adam, and said unto him, Where art thou? And he said, I heard thy voice in the garden, and I was afraid, because I was naked; and I hid myself. And he said, Who told thee that thou wast naked?
We started with obeisances to the theories of some favorite shame gurus:
- St. Paul: The readings from I Corinthians gave us a good laugh and made the point that notions of what is shameful shift with time and place.
- Freud (via Fenechel): Psychoanalysts have strong evidence that shame is based in "urethral eroticism" — i. e., control issues around the flow of urine. The male "penetrative" and female "letting go" drives become sources of pleasure in the child, but can get tricky when contrasexual drives arise. The underlying bisexual feelings can become quite threatening particularly in boys who extrapolate castration from a desire to let go. Bed wetting is associated with this and the invariable punishment is "pillorization" (Fenechel's word) or public shaming — so reminiscent of queer-bashing later. The member who brought us this theory kindly provided us the scientific translation: male female drives are an indication of completeness. "Let the 'male and female' of God's creating appear," (see Science and Health, p. 249: 7). Note how Mrs. Eddy then proceeds to describe each energy in the following two sentences, and shows them to be one in the marginal note "Renewed Selfhood".
- John Bradshaw relates shame to the dysfunctional family system. It grows out of how the person as a kid was treated. It's an overwhelming sense of worthlessness, far more debilitating than guilt, which is event-oriented. Indeed, those afflicted with shame may use guilt as a defense against feeling shame. They'll seek ways to evoke guilt in order not to be sucked down into their shame.
A member brought up a testimony he had heard on Wednesday in which the testifier was healed after reading an article in a June 1950 issue of The Christian Science Sentinel which asked the question, "Who told thee that thou wast naked?" (Genesis 3: 11). She used this on a disease diagnosed by a doctor and could see it was not God's verdict. Our member felt we could question shame's deleterious effects by asking, "Who says? God?"
Now we felt ready to go around the room and see how members who wanted to share saw shame's impact on their lives:
- One member said her feelings of shame and worthlessness evolved from her mother's attitude to her which she summarized with the expression, "Ech!" She got in the habit of feeling something was terribly wrong with her and brings this into all adult relationships.
- Another spoke of fractured relationships with parents and other adults, incorporating neglect, incest, extreme criticism, alcoholism and spells in mental institutions for one parent. He often feels the downward pull of shame particularly around issues of how to relate to people.
- Another talked about how his family shamed him constantly about his individuality which in time came to include homosexuality. He felt under attack all the time. His coping mechanism was to fight back and this has left him with little peace and relaxation based on any assumption that people will accept him as he is.
- Another described a recurrent pattern in his life of getting something going in say a business or romance area only to see it fall apart soon thereafter. He wondered whether this was somehow related to shame. We didn't have time to explore this very far but there were some childhood issues hinting at things set up then that could bring this kind of result today. He is working on his problem in another format which he described to us and we'll look at it below.
Some examples of Gay-based shame came up.
- The new English movie, "Get Real" about Gay teenagers trying to forge intimacy in a constantly homophobic setting was recommended. The ability of one character to deal with shame was very moving.
- The Gay connection in the Littleton and other high school shootings is now coming to light. Apparently the shooters were almost always called fag or queer whether they were Gay or not. These taunts are the common currency for disrespect. The underlying shame is horrendous.
- We discussed Abraham Lincoln's homosexuality and the fact that it took only 130 years to become part of his history. Maybe a bit of shame there? Let's watch the scholars go at it on this one. We also noted the tendency of Gay people — ourselves included — to latch on to famous people's homosexuality to shore up our own low self-esteem. This can be only a quick fix and no substitute for the hard work — but is it really all that hard? — of reflecting the Light in our own lives.
- A non-attending member called in an observation that all the hiding, costuming, clone-like behavior in our community bespeak huge shame about being just who we individually are. In this vein another noted that over-achievement is a defense against feelings of worthlessness. The greater the success, the worse the problem since the sufferer is more and more convinced that his worth depends on his achievements and the bleeding wound beneath is unaddressed.
- Shame could be used as a "centering technique". Better to let oneself down into that than to take desperate flight in some mania. "When thou art bidden, go and sit in the lowest room; that when he who bade thee cometh, he may say unto thee, Friend, go up higher," (Luke 14: 10).
- One could practice egoism as opposed to egotism. In Unity of Good, page 27, Mrs. Eddy describes the difference as used in Science. Included is this statement: "...evil is egotistic, — boastful, but fleeting like a shadow at daybreak; while God is egoistic, knowing only His own all-presence, all-knowledge, all-power."
- One member is putting into practice the teachings of Mark Thurston's book Discover Your Soul's Purpose. The student works to come up with a so-called "chief feature", embodying his major life problem. Our member feels he has a good handle on this now — his recurrent fizzling of business and romantic prospects, discussed above — and wants now to carry the problem to a scientific conclusion. It's clear that his "chief feature" is a mortal version of his Christ-identity .
- One member found her therapist, with whom she was trying to forge a mother-like relationship, making "helpful" remarks that merely indicated she wasn't paying attention to the underlying thrust of the therapy. Our member was hurt but saw clearly that the lapse was the therapist's fault, not hers — as she always felt before in such cases. She "got it at a gut level, not just in her head." This facilitated turning to Truth and feeling the Motherhood of God right at hand.
- Another member became quite irritated when a non-Gay person told him, "I have nothing against Gay people, but..." There followed a string of less than lovely stereotypes. This member attended the Romancing the Shadow workshop two weeks ago — as described in our two previous meeting summaries. He quickly worked to evolve an inner figure embracing his own homophobia as well as a load of it from world thought. It virtually shouted its own name: "The Homophobe". Our member asked The Homophobe, "What do you want?" " I want you to be straight." "Why?" "Because it's so painful to be gay." "Yes, but that's what I am, painful or not." "I know..." Our member then broke into deep sobbing. Eventually it dried up and he found himself able more fully to accept his homosexuality as a natural part of God's love expressed in and as him.
- A member who fractured a bone in his leg two weeks ago is now getting around on a cane. He has been treating himself with large doses of gratitude to crowd out any sickly thoughts and fears and fantasies (see Miscellany 210: 1-17).
Jesus endured the shame, that he might pour his dear-bought bounty into barren lives.
All human knowledge and material sense must be gained from the five corporeal senses. Is this knowledge safe, when eating its first fruits brought death? "In the day that thou eatest thereof thou shalt surely die," was the prediction in the story under consideration. Adam and his progeny were cursed, not blessed; and this indicates that the divine Spirit, or Father, condemns material man and remands him to dust.
Genesis iii. 9, 10. And the Lord God [Jehovah] called unto Adam, and said unto him, Where art thou? And he said, I heard Thy voice in the garden, and I was afraid, because I was naked; and I hid myself.
Knowledge and pleasure, evolved through material sense, produced the immediate fruits of fear and shame. Ashamed before Truth, error shrank abashed from the divine voice calling out to the corporeal senses. Its summons may be thus paraphrased: "Where art thou, man? Is Mind in matter? Is Mind capable of error as well as of truth, of evil as well as of good, when God is All and He is Mind and there is but one God, hence one Mind?"
Fear was the first manifestation of the error of material sense. Thus error began and will end the dream of matter. In the allegory the body had been naked, and Adam knew it not; but now error demands that mind shall see and feel through matter, the five senses. The first impression material man had of himself was one of nakedness and shame. Had he lost man's rich inheritance and God's behest, dominion over all the earth? No! This had never been bestowed on Adam.
The condemnation of mortals to till the ground means this,—that mortals should so improve material belief by thought tending spiritually upward as to destroy materiality.
The notion of a material universe is utterly opposed to the theory of man as evolved from Mind. Such fundamental errors send falsity into all human doctrines and conclusions, and do not accord infinity to Deity.
The great truth in the Science of being, that the real man was, is, and ever shall be perfect, is incontrovertible; for if man is the image, reflection, of God, he is neither inverted nor subverted, but upright and Godlike.
Mortals will disappear, and immortals, or the children of God, will appear as the only and eternal verities of man. Mortals are not fallen children of God. They never had a perfect state of being, which may subsequently be regained. They were, from the beginning of mortal history, "conceived in sin and brought forth in iniquity." Mortality is finally swallowed up in immortality. Sin, sickness, and death must disappear to give place to the facts which belong to immortal man.
Learn this, O mortal, and earnestly seek the spiritual status of man, which is outside of all material selfhood.
A sense of evil is supposed to have spoken, been listened to, and afterwards to have formed an evil sense that blinded the eyes of reason, masked with deformity the glories of revelation, and shamed the face of mortals.
What was this sense? Error versus Truth: first, a supposition; second, a false belief; third, suffering; fourth, death.
Is man the supposer, false believer, sufferer?
Not man, but a mortal—the antipode of immortal man. Supposing, false believing, suffering are not faculties of Mind, but are qualities of error.
When the human senses wake from their long slumber to see how soon earth's fables flee and faith grows wearisome, then that which defies decay and satisfies the immortal cravings is sought and found. In the twilight of the world's pageantry, in the last-drawn sigh of a glory gone, we are drawn towards God.