Affection

May 28, 1998

Chapter XII

Christian Science Practice

Why art thou cast down, O my soul [sense]? And why art thou disquieted within me? Hope thou in God; for I shall yet praise Him, Who is the health of my countenance and my God.--Psalms.

And these signs shall follow them that believe: In my name shall they cast out devils: they shall speak with new tongues; they shall take upserpents; and if they drink any deadly thing, it shall not hurt them; they shall lay hands on the sick, and they shall recover.--Jesus.

It is related in the seventh chapter of Luke's Gospel that Jesus was once the honored guest of a certain Pharisee, by name Simon, though he was quite unlike Simon the disciple. While they were at meat, an unusual incident occurred, as if to interrupt the scene of Oriental festivity. A "strange woman" came in. Heedless of the fact that she was debarred from such a place and such society, especially under the stern rules of rabbinical law, as positively as if she were a Hindoo pariah intruding upon the household of a high-caste Brahman, this woman (Mary Magdalene, as she has since been called) approached Jesus. According to the custom of those days, he reclined on a couch with his head towards the table and his bare feet away from it. It was therefore easy for the Magdalen to come behind the couch and reach his feet. She bore an alabaster jar containing costly and fragrant oil,--sandal oil perhaps, which is in such common use in the East. Breaking the sealed jar, she perfumed Jesus' feet with the oil, wiping them with her long hair, which hung loosely about her shoulders, as was customary with women of her grade.

Did Jesus spurn the woman? Did he repel her adoration? No! He regarded her compassionately. Nor was this all. Knowing what those around him were saying in their hearts, especially his host, --that they were wondering why, being a prophet, the exalted guest did not at once detect the woman's immoral status and bid her depart,--knowing this, Jesus rebuked them with a short story or parable. He described two debtors, one for a large sum and one for a smaller, who were released from their obligations by their common creditor. "Which of them will love him most?" was the Master's question to Simon the Pharisee; and Simon replied, "He to whom he forgave most." Jesus approved the answer, and so brought home the lesson to all, following it with that remarkable declaration to the woman, "Thy sins are forgiven."

Why did he thus summarize her debt to divine Love? Had she repented and reformed, and did his insight detect this unspoken moral uprising? She bathed his feet with her tears before she anointed them with the oil. In the absence of other proofs, was her grief sufficient evidence to warrant the expectation of her repentance, reformation, and growth in wisdom? Certainly there was encouragement in the mere fact that she was showing her affection for a man of undoubted goodness and purity, who has since been rightfully regarded as the best man that ever trod this planet. Her reverence was unfeigned, and it was manifested towards one who was soon, though they knew it not, to lay down his mortal existence in behalf of all sinners, that through his word and works they might be redeemed from sensuality and sin.

Which was the higher tribute to such ineffable affection, the hospitality of the Pharisee or the contrition of the Magdalen? This query Jesus answered by rebuking self-righteousness and declaring the absolution of the penitent. He even said that this poor woman had done what his rich entertainer had neglected to do,--wash and anoint his guest's feet, a special sign of Oriental courtesy.

Here is suggested a solemn question, a question indicated by one of the needs of this age. Do Christian Scientists seek Truth as Simon sought the Saviour, through material conservatism and for personal homage? Jesus told Simon that such seekers as he gave small reward in return for the spiritual purgation which came through the Messiah. If Christian Scientists are like Simon, then it must be said of them also that they love little.

On the other hand, do they show their regard for Truth, or Christ, by their genuine repentance, by their broken hearts, expressed by meekness and human affection, as did this woman? If so, then it may be said of them, as Jesus said of the unwelcome visitor, that they indeed love much, because much is forgiven them. Did the careless doctor, the nurse, the cook, and the brusque business visitor sympathetically know the thorns they plant in the pillow of the sick and the heavenly homesick looking away from earth,--Oh, did they know!--this knowledge would do much more towards healing the sick and preparing their helpers for the "midnight call," than all cries of "Lord, Lord!" The benign thought of Jesus, finding utterance in such words as "Take no thought for your life," would heal the sick, and so enable them to rise above the supposed necessity for physical thought-taking and doctoring; but if the unselfish affections be lacking, and common sense and common humanity are disregarded, what mental quality remains, with which to evoke healing from the outstretched arm of righteousness? If the Scientist reaches his patient through divine Love, the healing work will be accomplished at one visit, and the disease will vanish into its native nothingness like dew before the morning sunshine. If the Scientist has enough Christly affection to win his own pardon, and such commendation as the Magdalen gained from Jesus, then he is Christian enough to practise scientifically and deal with his patients compassionately; and the result will correspond with the spiritual intent.

If hypocrisy, stolidity, inhumanity, or vice finds its way into the chambers of disease through the would-be healer, it would, if it were possible, convert into a den of thieves the temple of the Holy Ghost,--the patient's spiritual power to resuscitate himself. The unchristian practitioner is not giving to mind or body the joy and strength of Truth. The poor suffering heart needs its rightful nutriment, such as peace, patience in tribulation, and a priceless sense of the dear Father's loving-kindness.

In order to cure his patient, the metaphysician must first cast moral evils out of himself and thus attain the spiritual freedom which will enable him to cast physical evils out of his patient; but heal he cannot, while his own spiritual barrenness debars him from giving drink to the thirsty and hinders him from reaching his patient's thought,--yea, while mental penury chills his faith and understanding.

The physician who lacks sympathy for his fellow-being is deficient in human affection, and we have the apostolic warrant for asking: "He that loveth not his brother whom he hath seen, how can he love God whom he hath not seen?" Not having this spiritual affection, the physician lacks faith in the divine Mind and has not that recognition of infinite Love which alone confers the healing power. Such so-called Scientists will strain out gnats, while they swallow the camels of bigoted pedantry.

The physician must also watch, lest he be overwhelmed by a sense of the odiousness of sin and by the unveiling of sin in his own thoughts. The sick are terrified by their sick beliefs, and sinners should be affrighted by their sinful beliefs; but the Christian Scientist will be calm in the presence of both sin and disease, knowing, as he does, that Life is God and God is All.

If we would open their prison doors for the sick, we must first learn to bind up the broken-hearted. If we would heal by the Spirit, we must not hide the talent of spiritual healing under the napkin of its form, nor bury the morale of Christian Science in the grave-clothes of its letter. The tender word and Christian encouragement of an invalid, pitiful patience with his fears and the removal of them, are better than hecatombs of gushing theories, stereotyped borrowed speeches, and the doling of arguments, which are but so many parodies on legitimate Christian Science, aflame with divine Love.

This is what is meant by seeking Truth, Christ, not "for the loaves and fishes," nor, like the Pharisee, with the arrogance of rank and display of scholarship, but like Mary Magdalene, from the summit of devout consecration, with the oil of gladness and the perfume of gratitude, with tears of repentance and with those hairs all numbered by the Father.

A Christian Scientist occupies the place at this period of which Jesus spoke to his disciples, when he said: "Ye are the salt of the earth." "Ye are the light of the world. A city that is set on an hill cannot be hid." Let us watch, work, and pray that this salt lose not its saltness, and that this light be not hid, but radiate and glow into noontide glory.

The infinite Truth of the Christ-cure has come to this age through a "still, small voice," through silent utterances and divine anointing which quicken and increase the beneficial effects of Christianity. I long to see the consummation of my hope, namely, the student's higher attainments in this line of light.

Science and Health, by Mary Baker Eddy

In the modes of love, affection seems the most settled, the most warmly and constructively beneficent.  Passionate love even unreciprocated is raw and possessive but then it is most aimed at transcendence and transformation.  Trophy love (e.g., "Look at the beauty I've snagged.") seems aimed the same way.  Tough love, if truly that and not just self-righteousness, can be painful but effective.

Everyone seems in favor of affection and its feelings of caring, support and inclusiveness.  But can it be experienced from without?  Does another's smile, warm greeting, even deeds done evidence affection or might they be just a mask for something else?  In truth, affection is something we can experience only from within ourselves, no matter what is going on "out there".

The definitions we received from the past — Webster's 1820 and 1958 dictionaries, as well as those from more modern tomes — indicate differences and shifts in emphasis, so that when reading any of Mary Baker Eddy's texts, we need care in assessing her meaning for a word like affection.  We are not always using the same language.  For instance, the older senses of the word include infection, as well as simple feeling and emotion (not always loving) and, predictably, a state of being affected by something.

In our meeting, we more or less settled on the modern sense of fond and tender feelings for another.  And we did not devalue the other forms of love — they all have their place in the human scheme of things, their upside and downside, and their divine equivalents.  It was apparent that to the extent that true affection does not accompany these other forms, their drives are not towards relationships per se, but towards spiritual growth.  ("Let me find within myself what obsesses me about the Other."  And, perhaps rather annoyingly this process may necessitate pursuing the so-called relationship with Other until the inner pattern is clear.)

For student of Christian Science, the healing potential of affection is in its preparation of thought for the ability to see the man in Science:   "Jesus beheld in Science the perfect man, who appeared to him where sinning mortal man appears to mortals.  In this perfect man the Saviour saw God's own likeness, and this correct view  of man healed the sick" (Science and Health, pg. 476:32-4).  The first few pages of the chapter entitled "Christian Science Practice" in Science and Health describe the process of surrender Mary Magdalene had to go through to experience the "ineffable affection" of the Christ.  Mary Baker Eddy implies that she herself had to go through something akin to this to be ready to practice Christian Science, and that each of us will  have to achieve a similar surrender, through suffering or Science, to let go of mere human affection for the divine.  As one of our internet friends put it, "...no matter what affects us there is only one affector — the great I AM.  We are all one and must not get lost in feedback loops which cut us off from this great I AM..."

Healings:

One member of our group, having been with several people who were coughing vociferously, soon found himself also coughing.  Remembering the old sense of affection as "infection", he saw that this was one of mortal mind's counterfeit relationship strategies which could be lived at the divine level instead — God being the only I or Us — and he was well again.

One found himself with the beginnings of a cold one morning.  As he started Christian Science work, he remembered he had a glass of Scotch Whiskey the night before, and the argument that he was a poor example of Christian Scientist and could not be healed appeared.  He brushed this aside and knew God was his Life, untouched by colds or even whiskey.  He was healed.

A participant, discussing summer plans with a friend, found, when she called his attention to it, that he had said he had to do a couple of things.  She said "You have to?  Is there no joy in these for you?"  He quickly saw this as a childhood motif — his mother always put things, even joyful things, in an obligational frame, thus obscuring the joy.  He remembered that joy constitutes man and he could let go of this old foolishness.

One member mentioned that in spite of having many healings to share he has never been able to give a testimony at church.  He feels hostility from the congregation.   Several people at the meeting shared how they had worked through similar feelings and had to restrain themselves now, to give others a chance to stand up.  One said that after 20 years of sitting through meetings he finally got up one Wednesday, shaking horribly, and said first thing "I'm extremely nervous but I don't feel that's a good enough reason to stay seated."  He then gave the first of what, over the subsequent years, has been many testimonies.

Browse the Archives

List by Title

List by Date

Search the Archives